Breastfeeding vs. Bottle
Jun. 7th, 2009 12:34 amHoly smokes...
I'm having some breastfeeding issues, and despite lots of advice from our nice health visitor, I was considering joining a "mommy-community" to exchange experienses and such. But after browsing through a few, I'm properly terrified!
Some people are really mean about breastfeeding!
We can all easily agree that breast milk is the best thing for the baby. But some people seem to think that if you don't breastfeed 100%, then you're practically a child abuser! Eeek!
As much as I'd like to discuss my baby with other moms, I'm SO not equipped to defending my choices to people like that! I mean, seriously! Am I a child abuser, because I think my baby's hunger being sated is more important than "doing the only proper/natural/best thing"? Am I simply unintelligent because I don't think that breastfeeding for hours and hours to stimulate milk that clearly isn't enough is neccesarily the best thing for either baby or me?
If bottle feeding gives me a happy, healthy baby, then I'm more than happy to skip the breastfeeding.
For the record, I can breastfeed, and I do. But I do not have enough milk. And despite all the good advice and tons of methods of getting more milk, my son still needs a little extra from a bottle. And frankly, I'm fine with that.
Gotta go. My baby is hungry. (Very fitting actually.)
I'm having some breastfeeding issues, and despite lots of advice from our nice health visitor, I was considering joining a "mommy-community" to exchange experienses and such. But after browsing through a few, I'm properly terrified!
Some people are really mean about breastfeeding!
We can all easily agree that breast milk is the best thing for the baby. But some people seem to think that if you don't breastfeed 100%, then you're practically a child abuser! Eeek!
As much as I'd like to discuss my baby with other moms, I'm SO not equipped to defending my choices to people like that! I mean, seriously! Am I a child abuser, because I think my baby's hunger being sated is more important than "doing the only proper/natural/best thing"? Am I simply unintelligent because I don't think that breastfeeding for hours and hours to stimulate milk that clearly isn't enough is neccesarily the best thing for either baby or me?
If bottle feeding gives me a happy, healthy baby, then I'm more than happy to skip the breastfeeding.
For the record, I can breastfeed, and I do. But I do not have enough milk. And despite all the good advice and tons of methods of getting more milk, my son still needs a little extra from a bottle. And frankly, I'm fine with that.
Gotta go. My baby is hungry. (Very fitting actually.)